Peculiarities of Post Cryopreservation Changes in Structural and Functional Characteristics of Hematopoietic Stem Cells Derived from Various Source
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/cryo24.02.118Keywords:
cryopreservation, fetal liver, bone marrow cells, hemopoietic stem cellsAbstract
The performed comparative analysis of structural and functional status of fetal liver (FL) hematopoietic stem cells
(HSCs) of 14 gestation days and adult bone marrow (BM) of 4-month-old CBA/H mice demonstrated not only the differences of their initial qualitative and quantitative characteristics but also different responses to the effect of cryopreservation factors. Either FL or BM cells were frozen according to various regimens under protection of 5 and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide. To estimate structural and functional characteristics of HSCs derived from different sources there were used cytofluorimetry (content of CD34+СD38– cells), methods of colony formation in vivo (CFUs) and in vitro (CFU-GM). It has been established that certain cryopreservation regimens are able to manifest the effect of selective enrichment of cell populations with phenotype of hemopoietic progenitors (CD34+CD38– cells). Comparing the content of CFUs, CFU-GM, HSCs and cells with CD34+CD38– phenotype has shown that cryopreservation regimen for FL cells was not optimal for BM. It has been demonstrated that varying cryopreservation conditions allowed not only to provide optimal preservation rate of hemopoietic progenitors derived from FL and BM with various initial functional status, but to control it purposefully.
Probl Cryobiol Cryomed 2014; 24(2):118-131.
References
Burdon T.J., Paul A., Noiseux N. et al. Bone marrow stem cell derived paracrine factors for regenerative medicine: current perspectives and therapeutic potential. Bone Marrow Research 2011; 2011. Article ID 207326.
Catacchio I., Berardi S., Reale A. et al. Evidence for bone marrow adult stem cell plasticity: properties, molecular mechanisms, negative aspects, and clinical applications of hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells transdifferentiation. Stem Cells Int 2013; 2013. Article ID 589139.
Dubrava T.G. Efficiency of hemopoietic cell cryopreservation depending on their initial properties [dissertation]. Kharkov; 2005.
Ema H., Nakauchi H. Expansion of hematopoietic stem cells in the developing liver of a mouse embryo. Blood 2000; 95(7): 2284–2288. PubMed
Goltsev A.N., Babenko N.N., Dubrava T.G. et al. Modification of the state of bone marrow hematopoietic cells after cryopreservation. Int J Refrigeration 2006; 29(3): 358–367. CrossRef
Goltsev A.N., Dubrava T.G., Gayevskaya Yu.A. et al. Cryobiological technologies as a component of optimized methods in therapy of autoimmune diseases. Klin Imunol Alergol Infektol 2009; (1–2): 46–51.
Goltsev A.N., Dubrava T.G., Lutsenko E.D., et al. Search for the alternative to cryopreservation methods of modifing the immunereactivity of the allomyelotransplant. II. Possible co-transplantation of embryonic liver cells. Problems of Cryobiology 2000; (1): 10–21.
Goltsev A.N., Dubrava T.G., Ostankova L.V., et al. Peculiarities of cryopreservation effect on functional potential of fetal liver hemopoietic stem cells of various gestation terms. Problems of Cryobiology 2009; 19(2): 186–199.
Goltsev A.N., Grischenko V.I., Sirous M.A. et al. Cryopreservation: an optimizing factor for therapeutic potential of fetoplacental complex products. Biopreservation and Biobanking 2009; 7(1): 29–38. CrossRef PubMed
Goltsev A.N., Matsevitaya I.Yu., Lutsenko Ye.D., et al. On the modification of immunoreactivity of myelotransplant after cryopreservation. Problems of Cryobiology 2010; 20(2): 145–152.
Goltsev A.N., Ostankova L.V., Dubrava T.G. et al. Cryopreservation as the factor of modification of structural and functional state and the realization mechanism of therapeutic effect of compartment stem cells under autoimmune genesis pathology development. In: Goltsev A.N., editor. Current problems of cryobiology and cryomedicine. Kharkov; 2012. p. 543–551.
Goltsev A.N., Safranchuk O.V., Bondarovich M.O. et al. Change in cryolability of stem tumor cells depending on adenocarcinoma growth phase. Fiziol Zhurnal 2011; 57(4): 68–76.
Hattori Y., Kato H., Nitta M., Takamoto S. Decrease of L-selectin expression in human CD34+ cells on freeze–thawing and rapid recovery with short-term incubation. Exp Hematol 2001; 29(1): 114–112. CrossRef
Huang S., Law P., Ho A.D. Candidate hematopoietic stem cells from fetal tissues, umbilical cord blood vs. adult bone marrow and mobilized peripheral blood. Exp Hematol 1998; 26(12): 1162–1171. PubMed
Kozlova Yu.A., Goltsev A.N., Ostankov M.V. Influence of certain physical and chemical factors of cryopreservation on bone marrow cells with various initials structural an functional status. Problems of Cryobiology 2003; (4): 3–11.
Ljungman P., Bregni M., Brune M. et al. Allogeneic and autologous transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe 2009. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45(2): 219–234. CrossRef PubMed
Lutsenko E.D. Application of penning-methods for obtaining enriched stem cells of population from cryopreserved bone marrow. Problems of Cryobiology 1995; (4): 52–54.
Micklem H.S., Ford C.E., Evans E.P. et al. Competitive in vivo proliferation of foetal and adult haematopoietic cells in lethally irradiated mice. J Cell Physiol 1972; 79(2): 293–298. CrossRef PubMed
Ng Y.Y., van Kessel B., Lokhorst H.M. et al. Gene-expression profiling of CD34+ cells from various hematopoietic stem-cell sources reveals functional differences in stem-cell activity. J Leukoc Biol 2004; 75(2): 314–323. CrossRef PubMed
Nielsen J.S., McNagny K.M. Novel functions of the CD34 family. J Cell Sci 2008; 121: 3682–3692. CrossRef PubMed
Ojeda-Uribe M. Peripheral blood and BM CD34+CD38– cells show better resistance to cryopreservation than CD34+CD38+ cells in autologous stem cell transplantation. Cytotherapy 2004; 6(6): 571–583. CrossRef PubMed
Orkin S.H., Nathan D.G., Ginsburg D. et al., editors. Nathan and Oski's hematology of infancy and childhood. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2009.
Porozhan Ye.A., Ostankov M.V., Babenko N.N., Goltsev A.N. Assessment of phenotype characteristics of fetal neural cells after cryopreservation using different freezing regimens. Problems of Cryobiology 2012; 22(1): 39–48.
Rosillo M.C., OrtuÑo F., Rivera J., Moraleda J.M, Vicente V. Cryopreservation modifies flow-cytometric analysis of hemopoietic cells. Vox Sang 1995; 68(4): 210–214. CrossRef PubMed
Rowley S.D., Bensinger W.I., Gooley T.A. Effect of cell concentration on bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell cryopreservation. Blood 1994; 83(9): 2731–2736. PubMed
Rubinshtein A., Trobaugh F. Ultrastructure of presumptive hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 1973; 42(1): 61–80.
Shereshkov S.I. Culturing of hemapoietic cells on semisolid nutrient media. Lab Delo 1974; (3): 146–150.
Shizuru J.A., Negrin R.S., Weissman I.L. Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells: clinical and preclinical regeneration of the hematolymphoid system. Annu Rev Med 2005; 56: 509–538. CrossRef PubMed
Suzuki A., Zheng Y., Kaneko S. et al. Clonal identication and characterization of self–renewing pluripotent stem cells in the developing liver. J Cell Biol 2002; 156(1): 173–184. CrossRef PubMed
Till J.E., McCulloch E.A. A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells. Radiat Res 1961; 14: 213–222. CrossRef
Tyndall A., Gratwohl A. Hemopoietic blood and marrow transplants in the treatment of severe autoimmune disease. Curr Opin Hematol 1997; 4(6): 390–394. CrossRef
Vermel A.E. Stem cells: total characteristic and application perspectives in clinical practice. Klin Meditsina 2004; (1): 5–11.
Wu D.D., Nayar R., Keating A. Synergistic effect of stem cell factor with interleukin-3 or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on the proliferation of murine primitive hematopoietic progenitors. Exp Hematol 1994; 22(6): 495–500. PubMed
Yampolskaya K.Ye., Goltsev A.N., Gurina T.M. Change in functional potential of fetal liver cells dependent from cryopreservation regimen. Svit Meditsiny i Biologii 2007; (1): 89–93.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Anatoly N. Goltsev, Tatiana G. Dubrava, Yulia A. Gaevskaya, Ekaterina E. Yampolskaya, Lyudmila V. Ostankova, Maksim V. Ostankov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
